Trade-offs between cost of ingestion and rate of intake drive defensive toxin use
Authors: Tyler Douglas 1; Sofia Beskid 3; Callie Gernand 2; Brianna Nirtaut 2; Kristen Tamsil 1; Richard Fitch 2; Rebecca Tarvin 1
Affiliations: 1) University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA; 2) Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN; 3) University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX
Keywords: m. adaptation; b. metabolism
Animals that ingest toxins can become unpalatable and even toxic to predators and parasites through toxin sequestration. Because most animals rapidly eliminate toxins to survive their ingestion, it is unclear how populations transition from susceptibility and toxin elimination to tolerance and accumulation as chemical defense emerges. Studies of chemical defense have generally focused on species with active toxin sequestration and target-site insensitivity mutations or toxin-binding proteins that permit survival without necessitating toxin elimination. Here, we investigate whether animals that presumably rely on toxin elimination for survival can utilize ingested toxins for defense. We use the A4 and A3 Drosophila melanogaster fly strains from the Drosophila Synthetic Population Resource (DSPR), which respectively possess elevated and reduced metabolic nicotine resistance amongst DSPR fly lines. We find that ingesting nicotine increased A4 but not A3 fly survival against Leptopilina heterotoma wasp parasitism. Further, we find that despite possessing genetic variants that enhance toxin elimination, A4 flies accrued more nicotine than A3 individuals likely by consuming more media. Our results suggest that enhanced toxin metabolism can allow for greater toxin intake by offsetting the cost of toxin ingestion. Passive toxin accumulation that accompanies increased toxin intake may underlie the early origins of chemical defense.